| | |
|
|
| | |
|
|
| The Rapture and the Bible part (3/5)Fri, 09 Jan 2009 01:21:10 -0800 by MkvineJohn Martignoni, president of the Bible Christian Society, gives a lecture on the rapture and endtime theology according to Catholic belief. He uses strictly the Bible to explain the rapture and to clear up some common misconceptions. In addition, he refutes some of the beliefs held by evangelicals, fundamentalist and non denominationalists.H ere is his link:http://www.bibl echristiansociety.co m/download Related: rapture endtimes second coming jesus christ catholic church bible john martignoni | |
|
|
| The Rapture and the Bible (part 2/5)Fri, 09 Jan 2009 01:19:35 -0800 by MkvineJohn Martignoni, president of the Bible Christian Society, gives a lecture on the rapture and endtime theology according to Catholic belief. He uses strictly the Bible to explain the rapture and to clear up some common misconceptions. In addition, he refutes some of the beliefs held by evangelicals, fundamentalist and non denominationalists. Check out his website: http://www.biblechri stiansociety.com/dow nload Related: rapture endtimes second coming jesus christ catholic church bible john martignoni | |
|
|
| The Rapture and the BibleFri, 09 Jan 2009 00:59:28 -0800 by MkvineJohn Martignoni, president of the Bible Christian Society, gives a lecture on the rapture and endtime theology according to Catholic belief. He uses strictly the Bible to explain the rapture and to clear up some common misconceptions. In addition, he refutes some of the beliefs held by evangelicals, fundamentalist and non denominationalists.C heck out his website:http://www.b iblechristiansociety .com/download Related: rapture endtimes second coming jesus christ catholic church bible john martignoni | |
|
|
| | |
|
|
| 666 - Part 12 : Lucifera - The Whore of BabylonThu, 08 Jan 2009 22:06:48 -0800 by xRevelatorLucifera - The Whore of Babylonhttp://666.xj ohn.com_____________ ____________________ _______Shocked as I am, I believe you will be shocked as well. The physical evidences and facts are really hard to refute and rather difficult to accept and acknowledge. This is not a matter of believing, but rather a matter of acceptance.As the Ten Commandments write: "You shall have no other gods before me.""You shall not make for yourself a graven image""You shall not bow down to them or serve them"The Bible really meant well. Do you want to be like it? Do you still want to bow down before it? Is this not an abomination to you as well?It is written:Deuteronomy 27:15"'Cursed be the man who makes a graven or molten image, an abomination to the LORD"And that curse is:Romans 1:2626 Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones. 27 In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion....Rememb er, you become what you worship. Idolatries are nothing more but plain deception. A deception for you to worship some entity other than what you think it is. Everything is concealed in secret subliminally. It does not matter whether you are deceived, what really matter is that you bow down before it and worship it. It is all for its glorification.Other secret revelation can be found in this video. It would help you understand more if you watch the previous videos as well, starting from Part 1. If you have not done so, I strongly suggest it before advancing to the next ones, otherwise, you'll have problems comprehending as this will get more complex as we advance. Increase in knowledge. Protect yourselves from deception. Get out of the Babylonian religious organization which is still in control even today. Although they do things in secret and concealment, it is only meant to be exposed to the light.Are you prepared for the supernatural?... continued to Part 13 Related: false messiah anti christ 666 vatican illuminati zeitgeist 9-11 beast sun of god revelation saturn sumerian prophecy baphomet satan devil rapture evil new world order goat mendes sabbatical nibiru 2012 satyr saturnus saturnalia mark rfid chip | |
|
|
| | |
|
|
| | |
|
|
| | |
|
|
| | |
|
|
| Refutation of Alvin Plantinga's evolutionary argument against naturalismWed, 07 Jan 2009 08:50:46 -0800 by FatGermanBastardWatch Veritas48's video series first:http://www.you tube.com/watch?v=HKT j6Pq5e2QRefutation of Alvin Plantinga's evolutionary argument against naturalismVeritas48' s / Alvin Plantinga's argument:1. If naturalism and evolution are true then the probability of our cognitive abilities tobe reliable is low.2. If the probability of our cognitive abilities to be reliable is low then the probabilityof any belief we arrived at using our cognitive abilities is low.3. People who believe that N&E are true have arrived at this belief using their cognitiveabilities.4 . Therefore given N&E the probability of the belief in N&E being true is low.5. Therefore the idea that N&E are both true can be rejected.My counter argument:1. If N&E are both true and Plantinga is right then any believe that we arrived at usingour cognitive abilities can be rejected.2. Plantinga arrived at the believe that his premises are true using his cognitiveabilities.3 . Therefore if N&E are both true and Plantinga is right then according to Plantinga thebelief in Plantinga's premises can be rejected.4. Therefore Plantinga's premises can only be considered as valid if we know that the beliefin N&E can be rejected.5. Therefore by presenting his premises as true beliefs Plantinga's premises areimplicitly presupposing that N&E can be rejected.6. That N&E can be rejected is what Plantinga is trying to prove.7. Therefore Plantinga's premises are presupposing that the conclusion is true.8. Therefore Plantinga's argument is circular and invalid.The problem with Christian epistemology:We need to know that God exists in order to be able to have knowledge.But unless we know that we are able to have knowledge we do not know if we are able toknow that God exists.Tags:Refutati on Alvin Plantinga evolutionary argument against naturalism evolution atheism faith jesus god nihilism relativism agnostic atheist epistemology truth relative absolute bible circular Related: refutation alvin plantinga evolutionary argument against naturalism evolution atheism faith jesus god nihilism relativism agnostic atheist epistemology truth relative absolute bible circular | |
|
|
| | |
|
|
| | |
|
|
| | |
|
|
| Together, we will defend Free Speech!Thu, 01 Jan 2009 05:21:21 -0800 by AndromedasWakePLEASE READ! Click 'more info'Firstly, happy new year to you all. I hope you all had a safe one to see in 2009. You might see this video around the 'Tube quite a bit; at least, that's what I hope.I leave it to you, the internet, to make this video viral. Even if you send it to just two people and encourage them to do the same, this message will travel a great distance.PLEASE download and re-post this video to your channel:http://www.m ediafire.com/?nymwxt zz2mqSubtitle track for YouTube (UK English): http://www.mediafire .com/?mqz4awcmyzmFea ture it, rate every copy you see, share it, favourite it, comment it.It's a new year, and it's time to stand up against the infamous creationist practise of filing false DMCA notices to have their critics shut down. Join us in looking out for one another and protecting our precious right to free speech, comment and analysis.If you are facing a DMCA notice, contact DMCAabuse:http://www .youtube.com/dmcaabu seYoutubers in this video in order of appearance:Thunderf0 0t - http://www.youtube.c om/thunderf00tExtant Dodo - http://www.youtube.c om/extantdododjarm67 - http://www.youtube.c om/djarm67AronRa - http://www.youtube.c om/aronraME! - http://www.youtube.c om/andromedaswakePot holer54 - http://www.youtube.c om/potholer54ThetaOm ega - http://www.youtube.c om/thetaomegaDonExod us2 -http://www.youtube. com/donexodus2dprjon es -http://www.youtube. com/dprjonescdk007 - http://www.youtube.c om/cdk007We all share an interest in science and we have respect for the advancements and benefits that science has brought us. The internet is one example of this.We believe that the internet offers extraordinary and valuable opportunities for education, and through sites such as you tube, a forum for open discussion and exchange of views. In order for people to fully benefit from the internet, freedom of speech, freedom of expression and a lack of censorship are essential.We are concerned that there are some people who are attempting to prohibit free speech on the internet. They are doing so by the unwarranted service of notices under the Digital Millenium Copyright Act, ("DMCA").We recognise that Copyright is an important legal right. The DMCA provides a method for copyright owners to protect their work against plagiarism and exploitation.However , we are also aware that some people are misusing the DMCA. They are issuing notices that are not a legitimate attempt to protect their copyright, but are a cynical way of attempting to prevent adverse comment on, and criticism of, their views. They are using it maliciously, wrongly and probably illegally. We consider such actions to be abhorrent. It is a sick and cowardly way of attempting to restrict free speech and limit the potential of the internet for education.Some of us have been subjected to such notices.We are sure that our own experiences are not the only occasions when the DMCA has been misused.We would like to know how often it is happening? Who else has been served with DMCA notices? Who served these notices? What happened as a result?We would like to hear from you by contacting us at the channel DMCAabuse (not this one) if you have been served with a DMCA notice that you consider was issued in order to prohibit free expression rather than to protect copyright. (Any information you send us will be treated with confidentiality and will not be disclosed without your prior permission.)We believe that opportunity for education, freedom of expression and freedom of speech are causes worth protecting. We want to do what we can to protect them.Please help us do that.Thank you. Related: thunderf00t potholer54 donexodus2 aronra cdk007 andromedaswake extantdodo djarm67 dprjones dmcaabuse false dmca censorship free speech | |
|
|
| Support Free Speech, Fight Censorship and FALSE DMCAsWed, 31 Dec 2008 23:01:11 -0800 by cdk007This video is a result of a collaboration between the following YouTube users:AndromedasWake AronRa cdk007 djarm67 DonExodus2 dprjones ExtantDodo potholer54 ThetaOmega Thunderf00tTo download this video copyright free please go to:http://www.mediaf ire.com/?4nzzjy3zmyd Please show your support and view, comment, favorite, and rate the copies of this video on all our channels.We all share an interest in science and we have respect for the advancements and benefits that science has brought us. The internet is one example of this.We believe that the internet offers extraordinary and valuable opportunities for education, and through sites such as YouTube, a forum for open discussion and exchange of views. In order for people to fully benefit from the internet, freedom of speech, freedom of expression and a lack of censorship are essential.We are concerned that there are some people who are attempting to prohibit free speech on the internet. They are doing so by the unwarranted service of notices under the Digital Millenium Copyright Act, ("DMCA").We recognize that Copyright is an important legal right. The DMCA provides a method for copyright owners to protect their work against plagiarism and exploitation.However , we are also aware that some people are misusing the DMCA. They are issuing notices that are not a legitimate attempt to protect their copyright, but are a cynical way of attempting to prevent adverse comment on, and criticism of, their views. They are using it maliciously, wrongly and probably illegally. We consider such actions to be abhorrent. It is a sick and cowardly way of attempting to restrict free speech and limit the potential of the internet for education.Some of us have been subjected to such notices.We are sure that our own experiences are not the only occasions when the DMCA has been misused.We would like to know how often it is happening? Who else has been served with DMCA notices? Who served these notices? What happened as a result?We would like to hear from you by contacting us at the channel DMCAabuse (not this one) if you have been served with a DMCA notice that you consider was issued in order to prohibit free expression rather than to protect copyright. (Any information you send us will be treated with confidentiality and will not be disclosed without your prior permission.)We believe that opportunity for education, freedom of expression and freedom of speech are causes worth protecting. We want to do what we can to protect them.Please help us do that.Thank you.http://www.youtu be.com/DMCAabuse Related: youtube censorship digital millennium copyright act dmca free speech debate truth creationist law legal intelligent design suppress block takedown notice constitution western values collaboration support andromedaswake aronra cdk007 djarm67 donexodus2 dprjones extantdodo potholer54 thetaomega thunderf00t | |
|
|
| | |
|
|
| | |
|
|
| How to Refute a Straw Man.Wed, 05 Dec 2007 00:18:57 -0800 by LaneChA straw man argument is an informal fallacy based on misrepresentation of an opponent's position. To "set up a straw man" or "set up a straw man argument" is to create a position that is easy to refute, then attribute that position to the opponent. Often, the straw man is set up to deliberately overstate the opponent's position. A straw man argument can be a successful rhetorical technique (that is, it may succeed in persuading people) but it is in fact a misleading fallacy, because the opponent's actual argument has not been refuted.Its name is derived from the practice of using straw men in combat training. In such training, a scarecrow is made in the image of the enemy with the single intent of attacking it. It is occasionally called a straw dog fallacy, scarecrow argument, or wooden dummy argument.This is a clip from CrossTV where Mark Kielar refutes Dennis Miller's straw man.http://www.cross tv.com Related: strawman dennis miller crosstv | |
|
| |
